BMC Health Services Research · 2015 · 15 citations · 15 references
Health ProfessionsHealth AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationHealthcare AdministrationHealthcare Quality ImprovementHospital AdministrationClinical GovernanceHealth Care GovernanceHealthcare GovernanceHealthcare Performance MeasurementHospital Performance EvaluationQuality Of CareAppropriateness EvaluationAppropriateness MeasurementAppropriateness Of CareAppropriateness Of Care UseClinical Care QualityClinical Quality MeasuresHealthcare Quality AssessmentHospital Stay Duration
BACKGROUND: Clinical Governance provides a framework for assessing and improving clinical quality through a single coherent program. Organizational appropriateness is aimed at achieving the best health outcomes and the most appropriate use of resources. The goal of the present study is to verify the likely relationship between Clinical Governance and appropriateness of hospital stay. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012 in an Italian Teaching Hospital. The OPTIGOV(©) (Optimizing Health Care Governance) methodology was used to quantify the level of implementation of Clinical Governance globally and in its main dimensions. Organizational appropriateness was measured retrospectively using the Italian version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol to analyze a random sample of medical records for each clinical unit. Pearson-correlation and multiple linear regression were used to test the relationship between the percentage of inappropriate days of hospital stay and the Clinical Governance implementation levels. RESULTS: 47 Units were assessed. The percentage of inappropriate days of hospital stay showed an inverse correlation with almost all the main Clinical Governance dimensions. Adjusted multiple regression analysis resulted in a significant association between the percentage of inappropriate days and the overall Clinical Governance score (β = -0.28; p < 0.001; R-squared = 0.8). EBM and Clinical Audit represented the Clinical Governance dimensions which had the strongest association with organizational appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the evaluation of both Clinical Governance and organizational appropriateness through standardized and repeatable tools, such as OPTIGOV(©) and AEP, is a key strategy for healthcare quality. The relationship between the two underlines the central role of Clinical Governance, and especially of EBM and Clinical Audit, in determining a rational improvement of appropriateness levels.
15
Dimensions of quality revisited: from thought to action.
R J Maxwell · BMJ Quality & Safety · 1992 · 213 citations · Full text
Ivana Musilová, Lenka Plíšková, Radka Kutová et al. · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · 2014 · 79 citations
Appropriateness of hospital utilisation in Italy
Nicola Nante, Antonio Boccia, Aida Bianco et al. · Public Health · 2000 · 69 citations
Health Professions, Health Administration, Health Services Administration +12