Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest Debriefing Improves Survival Outcomes*

Heather Wolfe, Carleen Zebuhr, Alexis Topjian, Akira Nishisaki, Dana Niles, Peter A. Meaney, Lori Boyle, Rita Giordano, Daniela Davis, Margaret A. Priestley,

Critical Care Medicine · 2014 · 318 citations · 40 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In-hospital cardiac arrest is an important public health problem. High-quality resuscitation improves survival but is difficult to achieve. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, interdisciplinary, postevent quantitative debriefing program to improve survival outcomes after in-hospital pediatric chest compression events. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Single-center prospective interventional study of children who received chest compressions between December 2008 and June 2012 in the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: Structured, quantitative, audiovisual, interdisciplinary debriefing of chest compression events with front-line providers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival of event (return of spontaneous circulation for ≥ 20 min) and favorable neurologic outcome. Primary resuscitation quality outcome was a composite variable, termed "excellent cardiopulmonary resuscitation," prospectively defined as a chest compression depth ≥ 38 mm, rate ≥ 100/min, ≤ 10% of chest compressions with leaning, and a chest compression fraction > 90% during a given 30-second epoch. Quantitative data were available only for patients who are 8 years old or older. There were 119 chest compression events (60 control and 59 interventional). The intervention was associated with a trend toward improved survival to hospital discharge on both univariate analysis (52% vs 33%, p = 0.054) and after controlling for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.91-6.8; p = 0.075), and it significantly increased survival with favorable neurologic outcome on both univariate (50% vs 29%, p = 0.036) and multivariable analyses (adjusted odds ratio, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.01-7.5; p = 0.047). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation epochs for patients who are 8 years old or older during the debriefing period were 5.6 times more likely to meet targets of excellent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (95% CI, 2.9-10.6; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an interdisciplinary, postevent quantitative debriefing program was significantly associated with improved cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival with favorable neurologic outcome.

References

40