The Analysis of Count Data: Overdispersion and Autocorrelation

David Barron

Sociological Methodology · 1992 · 208 citations · 21 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper reviews common count data methods, including Poisson and negative binomial regression, and introduces the less familiar quasi‑likelihood approach. The quasi‑likelihood method models overdispersion and can be extended to autocorrelation, and its small‑sample properties were examined through Monte Carlo simulations. Applied to U.S.

Abstract

I begin this paper by describing several methods that can be used to analyze count data. Starting with relatively familiar maximum likelihood methods-Poisson and negative binomial regression-I then introduce the less well known (and less well understood) quasi-likelihood approach. This method (like negative binomial regression) allows one to model overdispersion, but it can also be generalized to deal with autocorrelation. I then investigate the small-sample properties of these estimators in the presence of overdispersion and autocorrelation by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, I apply these methods to the analysis of data on the foundings of labor unions in the U.S. Quasi-likelihood methods are found to have some advantages over Poisson and negative binomial regression, especially in the presence of autocorrelation.

References

21