Outcome of liver retransplantation in children

Orthodoxos Achilleos, Darius F. Mirza, David Talbot, Patrick McKiernan, Susan V. Beath, Bridget Gunson, Jonathan W. Freeman, Antony D. Mayer, Paul McMaster, John Buckels,

Liver Transplantation and Surgery · 1999 · 43 citations · 37 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Irreversible liver graft failure is a life-threatening complication. We reviewed the first 200 pediatric liver transplantations in Birmingham. Forty-one children developed primary graft failure, 9 of whom developed secondary graft failure. The main indications for graft failure were primary nonfunction (PRNF; 8 patients), vascular complications (VASC; 23 patients), and chronic rejection (CHRE; 19 patients). Thirty-two children underwent retransplantation (ReTx) (21 children received reduced grafts; 11 children, whole hepatic grafts). Patient survival was significantly worse for retransplant recipients compared with children receiving a single graft (63% v 76. 5% actuarial patient survival at 1 year; P <.05). Primary graft 1-year actuarial survival was 74% in first grafts compared with 47% for regrafts (P <.05), but improved with time. The graft 1-year survival rate was 55% for whole grafts and 45% for reduced and/or split grafts in the first 100 grafts compared with 83% and 66% in the second 100 grafts, respectively (P <.01). Emergency ReTx within a month of transplantation was associated with more complications and a worse outcome (1-year survival rate, 37%) compared with patients who underwent ReTx later (1-year survival rate, 72%; P <. 01). The incidence of primary graft failure decreased from 33% in the first 100 grafts to 16% in the second 100 grafts (P <.01), as did the incidence of PRNF, which decreased from 8% to 0% (P <.05). Although the rates of graft failure from VASC decreased from 15% to 8% (P =.2) and CHRE decreased from 11% to 8% (P =.6), neither reached statistical significance. The improved results overall are because of advances in surgical techniques, intensive care management, and graft preservation and refinements in immunosuppression. We conclude that ReTx for a child with primary graft failure is justified.

References

37