Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 1993 · 13 citations · 0 references
EducationKinesiologyPhysiologyExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingPhysical ActivityAerobic CapacityCardiopulmonary Exercise TestingFitness AssessmentPhysical FitnessPhysical Fitness AssessmentTreadmill Exercise TestingAerobic Fitness AssessmentClinical Cardiorespiratory FitnessConfidence Intervals For Correlation CoefficientsExercise Test ReliabilityExercise Test ValidityMultiple RegressionPeak Exercise PerformanceRunning Physiology
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity of a 500-yard shallow water run test to determine peak aerobic power (VO2peak) and to compare it with the commonly used 1.5-mile run test. Subjects included 15 men and 28 women who completed two trials each of a 500-yard shallow water run test and a 1.5-mile run and then completed a graded exercise test on a treadmill to determine VO2peak. Correlation coefficients with measured VO2peak were -0.89 and -0.80 for the 1.5-mile and 500-yard water runs, respectively. Multiple regression analyses revealed that prediction of VO2peak from 1.5-mile run time was significantly improved by including the 1.5-mile run peak HR (R2 = 0.82, SEE = 3.52 ml.kg-1.min-1). Similarly, for the 500-yard water run test, percent body fat and height were significant additional predictors of VO2peak (R2 = 0.86, SEE = 3.19 ml.kg-1.min-1). We conclude that the 500-yard shallow water run test, especially when used with the descriptive measures of percent body fat and height, can provide a reasonable estimate of an individuals' cardiorespiratory fitness classification. However, caution is advised when administering these tests in older populations or in those with multiple coronary risk factors.