Journal of Structural Engineering · 1994 · 106 citations · 7 references
EngineeringMarine EngineeringOffshore StructuresStructural AnalysisStructural EngineeringDynamic Structural ResponseEarthquake Response Of StructuresNonlinear Structural AnalysisPost-earthquake Damage AssessmentSeismic Risk AnalysisStructural Response AnalysisCollapseEarthquake Risk AssessmentSeismic Damage AssessmentSeismic Hazard AnalysisSeismic Vulnerability AssessmentStructural Analysis Of Offshore PlatformsStructural Fragility AnalysisStructural Vulnerability Assessment
Conventional seismic hazard analysis methodology is generalized to estimate directly the annual seismic risk of exceeding a specified level of postelastic damage in real structures. The procedure makes use of empirical statistics of the nonlinear‐response‐based factor FDM that is a measure of the damage potential of ground motions to multi‐degree‐of‐freedom structures. Using a two‐dimensional model of a jacket‐type offshore platform and a large sample of observed time histories, it is confirmed that (as for single DOF systems): (1) There is no significant dependence of the average of FDM on magnitude and distance; and (2) its coefficient of variation is relatively small. These two facts make the method practical. They were confirmed for both local (member‐level) damage measures and global collapse, for variations in structure and foundation modeling, and for various durations. A companion paper presents applications to two large three‐dimensional, multi‐degree‐of‐freedom, nonlinear models of actual structures.
7
Engineering seismic risk analysis
C. Allin Cornell · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 1968 · 3.8K citations