BMC Cancer · 2013 · 45 citations · 12 references
MedicineOncologyUrologyCancer EpidemiologyGenitourinary OncologySurvival AnalysisBiomarkers In Genitourinary CancerBiomarkers In Urologic OncologyCancer Survival AnalysisPrognosis AssessmentPrognostic AssessmentProstate CancerGleason ScoringPrognosis Of Prostate DiseasePrognostic Factors AnalysisPrognostic IndicesPrognostic Tumor MarkersProstate Cancer IncidenceProstate Cancer PrognosisRelative Survival Analysis
BACKGROUND: As the incidence of prostate cancer continues to rise steeply, there is an increasing need to identify more accurate prognostic markers for the disease. There is some evidence that a higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) may be associated with poorer survival in patients with prostate cancer but it is not known whether this is independent of other established prognostic factors. Therefore the aim of this study was to describe the relationship between mGPS and survival in patients with prostate cancer after adjustment for other prognostic factors. METHODS: Retrospective clinical series on patients in Glasgow, Scotland, for whom data from the Scottish Cancer Registry, including Gleason score, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin, six months prior to or following the diagnosis, were included in this study. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty four prostate cancer patients were identified; of these, 497 (66.8%) died during a maximum follow up of 11.9 years. Patients with mGPS of 2 had poorest 5-year and 10-year relative survival, of 32.6% and 18.8%, respectively. Raised mGPS also had a significant association with excess risk of death at five years (mGPS 2: Relative Excess Risk = 3.57, 95% CI 2.31-5.52) and ten years (mGPS 2: Relative Excess Risk = 3.42, 95% CI 2.25-5.21) after adjusting for age, socioeconomic circumstances, Gleason score, PSA and previous in-patient bed days. CONCLUSIONS: The mGPS is an independent and objective prognostic indicator for survival of patients with prostate cancer. It may be useful in determining the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer in addition to established prognostic markers.
12
Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer
Timothy J Wilt, Michael K. Brawer, Karen Jones et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Michael Proctor, Dinesh Talwar, S M Balmar et al. · British Journal of Cancer · 2010 · 201 citations · Full text
C‐reactive protein as a prognostic marker for men with androgen‐independent prostate cancer
Tomasz M. Beer, Alshad S. Lalani, Stella Lee et al. · Cancer · 2008 · 106 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17