Extension of Thermodynamic Insights on Batch Extractive Distillation to Continuous Operation. 1. Azeotropic Mixtures with a Heavy Entrainer

Weifeng Shen, Hassiba Benyounes, Vincent Gerbaud

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2013 · 63 citations · 79 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Azeotropic mixtures with a heavy entrainer form class 1.0‑1a and 1.0‑2 ternary diagrams, whose subcases are determined by the position of the univolatility line. The study evaluates feasible product ranges and operating parameters—reflux ratio and entrainer/feed flow rate ratio—for batch and continuous extractive distillation, and compares entrainers using a proposed methodology. For class 1.0‑1a mixtures only one product can be recovered and a minimum reflux ratio exists, while continuous operation requires a higher minimum entrainer/feed ratio than batch; for class 1.0‑2 mixtures either component can be obtained depending on feed location, but the continuous process again has a narrower feasible range of reflux and feed ratios.

Abstract

We have studied the batch and continuous extractive distillation of minimum- and maximum-boiling azeotropic mixtures with a heavy entrainer. These systems exhibit class 1.0-1a and 1.0-2 ternary diagrams, each with two subcases depending on the location of the univolatility line. The feasible product and feasible ranges of the operating parameters reflux ratio (R) and entrainer/feed flow rate ratio for continuous (FE/F) and batch (FE/V) operation were assessed. Class 1.0-1a processes allow the recovery of only one product because of the location of the univolatility line above a minimum value of the entrainer/feed flow rate ratio for both batch and continuous processes. A minimum reflux ratio R also exists. For an identical target purity, the minimum feed ratio is higher for the continuous process than for the batch process, for the continuous process where stricter feasible conditions arise because the composition profile of the stripping section must intersect that of the extractive section. Class 1.0-2 mixtures allow either A or B to be obtained as a product, depending on the feed location. Then, the univolatility line location sets limiting values for either the maximum or minimum of the feed ratio FE/F. Again, the feasible range of operating parameters for the continuous process is smaller than that for the batch process. Entrainer comparison in terms of minimum reflux ratio and minimum entrainer/feed ratio is enabled by the proposed methodology.

References

79