RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications · 2014 · 10 citations · 12 references
ComputingComputer ScienceFormal MethodsParallel ComputingTheory Of ComputationAutomata TheoryComputational ModelsFinite AutomataFinite-state MachinesTuring MachinesLinear Bounded AutomataPowersTuring Machine Model
Based on the formal framework of reaction systems by Ehrenfeucht and Rozenberg [ Fund. Inform. 75 (2007) 263–280], reaction automata (RAs) have been introduced by Okubo et al. [ Theoret. Comput. Sci. 429 (2012) 247–257], as language acceptors with multiset rewriting mechanism. In this paper, we continue the investigation of RAs with a focus on the two manners of rule application: maximally parallel and sequential. Considering restrictions on the workspace and the λ -input mode, we introduce the corresponding variants of RAs and investigate their computation powers. In order to explore Turing machines (TMs) that correspond to RAs, we also introduce a new variant of TMs with restricted workspace, called s ( n )-restricted TMs. The main results include the following: (i) for a language L and a function s ( n ), L is accepted by an s ( n )-bounded RA with λ -input mode in sequential manner if and only if L is accepted by a log s ( n )-bounded one-way TM; (ii) if a language L is accepted by a linear-bounded RA in sequential manner, then L is also accepted by a P automaton [Csuhaj−Varju and Vaszil, vol. 2597 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Springer (2003) 219–233.] in sequential manner; (iii) the class of languages accepted by linear-bounded RAs in maximally parallel manner is incomparable to the class of languages accepted by RAs in sequential manner.
12
Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, Grzegorz Rozenberg · 2007 · 156 citations
Turing machines with restricted memory access
Patrick C. Fischer · Information and Control · 1966 · 100 citations