Publication | Open Access
Comparing data modeling formalisms
114
Citations
10
References
1995
Year
EngineeringRequirement ModelingSemantic WebSemantic Data ModelsInformation ModelInformation RequirementsData ScienceSemantic Data ModelManagementData IntegrationData ManagementKnowledge RepresentationRequirement AnalysisFormal ModelingBusiness Information SystemsInformation ManagementDatabase ModelSoftware DesignOrganizational Information RequirementsData-driven ModelingAutomated ReasoningFormal MethodsRequirements ModelingData ModelsData Modeling
Accurate specification and validation of information requirements is critical to the development of organizational information systems. Semantic data models were developed to provide a precise and unambiguous representation of organizational information requirements [9, 17]. They serve as a communication vehicle between analysts and users. After analyzing 11 semantic data models, Biller and Neuhold [3] conclude that there are essentially only two types of data modeling formalisms: entity-attribute-relationship (EAR) models and object-relationship (OR) models. Proponents of each claim their model yields “better” representations [7] than the other. There is, however, little empirical evidence to substantiate these claims.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1