A Comparison of Bone-Conduction Thresholds by Conventional and Rainville Methods

Abstract

No AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Sep 1962A Comparison of Bone-Conduction Thresholds by Conventional and Rainville Methods David P. Goldstein, Claude S. Hayes, and John L. Peterson David P. Goldstein Google Scholar More articles by this author , Claude S. Hayes Google Scholar More articles by this author and John L. Peterson Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0503.244 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America136:2 (EL96-EL102)1 Aug 2014Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholdsAnja Eichenauer, Harvey Dillon, Barry Clinch and Teck Loi The Hearing Journal58:3 (10-15)1 Mar 2005The clinical challenges of bone-conduction measurementJames W. Hall Indian Journal of Otolaryngology39:3 (114-116)1 Sep 1987Sensori—Neural acuity level test in conductive and mixed hearing lossB. Raj Shekhar, S. S. Chandrashekhar, P. Ramanjaneyulu and P. Hazarika E. Harris Nober and Gerard L. Kupperman (1981) Physiogenic Hearing Impairment in Adults Communication Disorders10.1007/978-1-4757-9760-2_3 International Audiology7:1 (126-128)1 Jan 1968L'Assourdissement Par Conduction Osseuse En Audiomèatrie VocaleM-J Rainville The Laryngoscope74:11 (1557-1560)1 Nov 1964Sal measurement after radical mastoidectomyE. R. Nilo and A. Schuking The Laryngoscope73:10 (1370-1376)1 Oct 1963The sal test in the prediction of stapedectomy resultsLudwig A. Michael Volume 5Issue 3September 1962Pages: 244-255 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Sep 1, 1962PubMed ID: 13899886 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1962 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...