Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2009 · 77 citations · 16 references
MusicEngineeringMotor SkillAerospace SimulationAerospace SystemMotor ControlPitch MotionFlight ControlAircraft Pitch AttitudeKinesiologyPhoneticsPitch RotationKinematicsHealth SciencesSensorimotor ControlCognitive ScienceAircraft NavigationVisuomotor LearningMechatronicsHeave Motion CuesPerception-action LoopAerospace EngineeringPitch Control TaskAerodynamicsHuman MovementAerospace Control
During aircraft pitch rotation, pilots experience combined pitch and heave motions that may influence control performance. The study aims to refine flight simulator motion filter tuning by elucidating how pilots utilize pitch and heave cues. An optimal control analysis was first conducted, followed by a pitch attitude experiment in the SIMONA simulator to assess the impact of pitch rotation, pitch heave, and center‑of‑gravity heave on pilot behavior. Pilot performance improved with pitch motion, evidenced by a higher crossover frequency due to increased visual gain and reduced visual lead; pitch heave produced smaller gains, while center‑of‑gravity heave had no significant effect.
During pitch rotation of the aircraft, a pilot, seated in front of the aircraft center of gravity, is subjected to rotational pitch and vertical heave motion. The heave motion is a combination of the vertical motion of the aircraft center of gravity and the heave motion as a result of the pitch rotation. In a pitch tracking task, all of these cues could potentially have a positive effect on performance and control behavior, as they are all related to the aircraft pitch attitude. To improve the tuning of flight simulator motion filters, a better understanding of how these motion components are used by the pilot is required. First, the optimal use of the different motion components was evaluated using an optimal control analysis. Next, an aircraft pitch attitude control experiment was performed in the SIMONA Research Simulator, investigating the effects of pitch rotation, pitch heave, and center of gravity heave on pilot control behavior. Pilot performance significantly improved with pitch motion, with an increased crossover frequency for the disturbance open loop. The increase in performance was a result of an increased visual gain and a reduction in visual lead, allowed for by the addition of pitch motion. Pitch heave motion showed similar but smaller effects. The center of gravity heave motion, although taking up most of the simulator motion space, was found to have no significant effects on performance and control behavior.
16