Oceanologia · 2010 · 37 citations · 59 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesOceanographyChemical OceanographyMarine BiogeochemistryRemote SensingInfrared Remote SensingOceanographic SensorsOptical Ocean SensorsRemote Sensing Image AnalysisDissolved Organic Matter SensingMultispectral Ocean SensingNear-infrared Ocean SensingOcean Color Remote SensingRemote Sensing Of AbsorptionRemote Sensing ReflectanceWater Constituent RetrievalWater Content Estimation
An extensive bio-optical data set obtained from field measurements was used to evaluate the performance of an empirical (Kowalczuket al. 2005) and two semi-analytical algorithms: Carder et al. (1999) and GSM01 (Maritorena et al. 2002) for estimating CDOMabsorption in the Baltic Sea. The data set includes coincident measurements of radiometric quantities and absorption coefficientsof CDOM made during 43 cruises between 2000 and 2008. In the first stage of the analysis, the accuracy of the empirical algorithmby Kowalczuk et al. (2005) was assessed using in situ measurements of remote sensing reflectance. Validation results improved whenmatching points located in Gulf of Gdańsk close to the Vistula River mouth were eliminated from the data set. The calculatederrors in the estimation of <i>a</i><sub>CDOM</sub>(400) in the first phase of the analysis were <i>Bias</i> = -0.02, RMSE = 0.46 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70.In the second stage, the empirical algorithm was tested on satellite data from SeaWiFS and MODIS imagery. The satellite data werecorrected atmospherically with the MUMM algorithm designed for turbid coastal and inland waters and implemented in the SeaDASsoftware. The results of the best case scenario for estimating the CDOM absorption coefficient <i>a</i><sub>CDOM</sub>(400), based on SeaWiFSdata, were <i>Bias</i> = -0.02, RMSE = 0.23 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40. The validation of the Kowalczuk et al. (2005) empirical algorithm applied toMODIS data led to a less accurate estimate of <i>a</i><sub>CDOM</sub>(400): <i>Bias</i> = -0.03, RMSE = 0.19 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.29. This assessment of the accuracy of standard semi-analytical algorithms available in the SeaWiFS and MODIS imagery processing software revealed that both algorithms (GSM_01 and Carder) underestimate CDOM absorption in the Baltic Sea with mean systematic and random errors in excess of 70%. The paper presents examples of theapplication of the Kowalczuk et al. (2005) empirical algorithm for producing maps of the seasonal distribution of <i>a</i><sub>CDOM</sub>(400) in the Baltic Sea between 2004 and 2008.
59
Analysis of variations in ocean color1
Anclré Morel, Louis Prieur · Limnology and Oceanography · 1977 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS
John E. O’Reilly, Stéphane Maritorena, B. Greg Mitchell et al. · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 1998 · 2.5K citations
On Conditions for the Vernal Blooming of Phytoplankton
Harald Sverdrup · ICES Journal of Marine Science · 1953 · 2.2K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Oceanography +11