The Astrophysical Journal · 2013 · 77 citations · 34 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanetary AstronomyPlanetary ScienceBinary Star OrbitsBinary Star SystemsExoplanetary SystemsSolar System AstronomyEclipse Timing VariationsEclipsing BinariesEclipsing Binary PhotometryEclipsing Binary StarsEclipsing Binary SystemsOrbital PeriodPhotometrySemi-major Axis
We present an analysis of eclipse timings of the post-common envelope binary NSVS 14256825, which is composed of an sdOB star and a dM star in a close orbit (P_orb = 0.110374 days). High-speed photometry of this system was performed between 2010 July and 2012 August. Ten newmid-eclipse times were analyzed together with all available eclipse times in the literature.We revisited the (O−C) diagram using a linear ephemeris and verified a clear orbital period variation. On the assumption that these orbital period variations are caused by light travel time effects, the (O−C) diagram can be explained by the presence of two circumbinary bodies, even though this explanation requires a longer baseline of observations to be fully tested. The orbital periods of the best solution would be Pc ~3.5 years and Pd ~6.9 years. The corresponding projected semi-major axes would be a_c sin i_c ~1.9AU and a_d sin i_d ~ 2.9AU. The masses of the external bodies would be Mc ~2.9M_Jupiter and Md ~8.1M_Jupiter, if we assume their orbits are coplanar with the close binary. Therefore NSVS 14256825 might be composed of a close binary with two circumbinary planets, though the orbital period variations is still open to other interpretations.
34
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice.
Robert E. Kass, W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson et al. · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1997 · 1.4K citations
The Determination of a Light-Time Orbit.
John B. Irwin · The Astrophysical Journal · 1952 · 493 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +11