Treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours with etoposide and cisplatin

Emmanuel Mitry, Éric Baudin, Michel Ducreux, J-C Sabourin, P Rufié, Thomas Aparicio, P Lasser, D. Élias, Pierre Duvillard, Martin Schlumberger,

British Journal of Cancer · 1999 · 495 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. The regimen consisted of etoposide 100 mg m⁻² on days 1–3 and cisplatin 100 mg m⁻² on day 1, given intravenously every 21 days to 53 patients (12 well‑differentiated, 41 poorly differentiated). In poorly differentiated tumours, the combination achieved a 41.5 % objective response rate (4 complete, 13 partial), median overall survival of 15 months, median progression‑free survival of 8.9 months, and 60 % grade 3–4 haematologic toxicity, confirming chemosensitivity but a poor 2‑year survival (<20 %).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate by a retrospective analysis of 53 patients the efficacy of chemotherapy combining etoposide and cisplatin in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. The regimen was a combination of etoposide 100 mg m–2 day–1 for 3 days and cisplatin 100 mg m–2 on day 1, given by 2-h intravenous infusion, administered every 21 days. Twelve patients had a well-differentiated and 41 a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumour. Toxicity of treatment was assessed in 50 patients and efficacy in 52 patients. Among the 11 patients with a well-differentiated tumour evaluable for tumoural response, only one (9.4%) had a partial response for 8.5 months. Forty-one patients with a poorly differentiated tumour showed an objective response rate of 41.5% (four complete and 13 partial responses); the median duration of response was 9.2 months, the median overall survival 15 months and the median progression-free survival 8.9 months. Haematological grade 3–4 toxicity was observed in 60% of the cases with one treatment-related death, digestive grade 3–4 toxicity in 40% and grade 3 alopecia was constant. No severe renal, hearing and neurological toxicities were observed (grade 1 in 6%, 14%, 72% respectively and no grade >1). We confirm that poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours are chemosensitive to the etoposide plus cisplatin combination. However, the prognosis remains poor with a 2-year survival lower than 20% confirming that new therapeutic strategies have to be developed.

References

19