Vox Sanguinis · 2006 · 70 citations · 12 references
MedicineInfectious DiseasesMolecular VirologyTransfusion MedicineVirologyBlood CollectionBlood Group SerologyDonor ScreeningDonor-specific AntibodiesTransfusion-transmitted InfectionsViral HepatitisDiagnostic SensitivityDonor-specific Antibody ScreeningInfection Risk FactorsInfection Risk ScreeningNucleic Acid AmplificationNucleic Acid Amplification DiagnosticsTransfusion-associated Infection PreventionTransfusion-transmitted Infection Testing
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since voluntary introduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) minipool nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) at the German Red Cross, the expected residual risk of a transfusion-associated HBV infection has been estimated to be 1 : 500,000 - about 10 times higher than for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Donors demonstrating chronic positivity for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), negativity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative with a low virus load are a major cause of this increased risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten-thousand blood donors from our blood-donation centre were screened for anti-HBc using the current PRISM HBc and the new PRISM HBcore assay to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of these tests. PRISM HBc- or PRISM HBcore-reactive samples were further analysed using seven additional tests for anti-HBc, two tests for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), one test for antibody to hepatitis B envelope antigen (anti-HBe) and three HBV NAT assays. RESULTS: From a total of 10,000 donors, nine and 14 samples were reactive only in the PRISM HBc and the PRISM HBcore, respectively, whereas 165 samples were reactive in both anti-HBc assays. Further analysis of these 188 anti-HBc-reactive specimens in a total of nine different anti-HBc assays revealed concordant results for 162 (86.2%) specimens. Sample cut-off values for anti-HBc were significantly (P < 0.01) lower for anti-HBc-only reactive samples compared with specimens that were also reactive for anti-HBs or anti-HBe. CONCLUSIONS: Both PRISM anti-HBc assays revealed that approximately 1.8% of non-prescreened blood donors from Germany were reactive for anti-HBc. Although sensitivity was comparable between both assays, specificity was increased significantly with the PRISM HBcore. High anti-HBc sample cut-off values were indicative for reactivity in other HBV parameters and for concordant results in the nine different anti-HBc assays. Look-back investigations are necessary to estimate the infection risk both of anti-HBc-only positive and of anti-HBc/anti-HBs-positive blood transfusions.
12
NAT for HBV and anti‐HBc testing increase blood safety
W. Kurt Roth, Marijke Weber, Detlev Petersen et al. · Transfusion · 2002 · 117 citations
Ruth Offergeld, Daniel Faensen, S. Ritter et al. · Eurosurveillance · 2005 · 95 citations · Full text