International Journal of Health Policy and Management · 2014 · 25 citations · 33 references
MedicineMedical EducationSurgeryClinical MedicineGeneral SurgeryMedical EthicsConsentPhysician-patient RelationshipSurgical Consent DocumentationConsent For Surgical ProcedureConsent In HealthcareConsent In Medical TreatmentInformed ConsentInformed Consent AuditingInformed Consent FormsSurgical Consent FormsTertiary Care Organization
BACKGROUND: The Surgical Informed Consent (SIC) is a comprehensive process that establishes an information-based agreement between the patient and his doctor to undertake a clearly outlined medical or surgical intervention. It is neither a casual formality nor a casually signed piece of paper. The present study was designed to audit the current knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards SIC at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional qualitative investigation was conducted under the auspices of the Department of Medical Education (DME), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad over three months period. A 19-item questionnaire was employed for data collection. The participants were selected at random from the list of the surgeons maintained in the hospital and approached face-to-face with the help of a team of junior doctors detailed for questionnaire distribution among them. The target was to cover over 50% of these doctors by convenience sampling. RESULTS: Out of 231 respondents, there were 32 seniors while 199 junior doctors, constituting a ratio of 1:6.22. The respondents variably responded to the questions regarding various attributes of the process of SIC. Overall, the junior doctors performed poorer compared to the seniors. CONCLUSION: The knowledge and attitudes of our doctors particularly the junior ones, towards the SIC are less than ideal. This results in their failure to avail this golden opportunity of doctor-patient communication to guide their patients through a solidly informative and legally valid SIC. They are often unaware of the essential preconditions of the SIC; provide incomplete information to their patients; and quite often do not ensure direct involvement of their patients in the process. Additionally they lack an understanding of using interactive computer-based programs as well as the concept of nocebo effect of informed consent.
33
Involving Patients in Clinical Decisions
Richard A. Deyo, Daniel C. Cherkin, James N. Weinstein et al. · Medical Care · 2000 · 221 citations
Enhancement of Surgical Informed Consent by Addition of Repeat Back
Aaron S. Fink, Allan V. Prochazka, William G. Henderson et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2010 · 121 citations
Medicine, Medical Education, Surgery +14
Improving Informed Consent of Surgical Patients Using a Multimedia-Based Program?
Elfriede Bollschweiler, Jonas Apitzsch, Rainer Obliers et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2008 · 121 citations
Medicine, Medical Education, Surgery +14