Journal of Fluids Engineering · 2002 · 126 citations · 19 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringMaterials CharacterizationSurface EngineeringGrain-size AnalysisSoil TextureSurface CharacterizationSurface MetrologySurface RoughnessSurface TopographyOptical ProfilometryRoughnessSkin FrictionSkin-friction CoefficientSurface GeometrySurface Roughness AnalysisSurface Roughness MeasurementThree-dimensional Surface Roughness
The study analyzes randomly placed, nonuniform, three‑dimensional roughness with irregular geometry and develops new correlations to determine equivalent sand‑grain roughness size ks from a modified Sigal and Danberg parameter Λs. Numerical procedures are applied to 3‑D profilometry data to compute Λs, which are then validated against analytic geometry and experimental measurements on channel walls. Skin‑friction coefficients measured in the channel agree with values predicted by the numerical procedures and existing correlations, confirming that ks can be reliably obtained from surface geometry alone.
Randomly placed, nonuniform, three-dimensional roughness with irregular geometry and arrangement is analyzed. New correlations are presented for such roughness for determination of magnitudes of equivalent sand grain roughness size ks from a modified version of the Sigal and Danberg parameter Λs. Also described are the numerical procedures employed to determine Λs from three-dimensional profilometry data. The sand grain roughness values determined with this approach are then compared with and verified byks magnitudes determined using: (i) analytic geometry for uniformly shaped roughness elements arranged in a regular pattern on a test surface, and (ii) measurements made with nonuniform, three-dimensional, irregular roughness with irregular geometry and arrangement. The experiments to obtain these measurements are conducted using this latter type of roughness placed on the walls of a two-dimensional channel. Skin friction coefficients are measured in this channel with three different types of rough surfaces on the top and bottom walls, and agree very well with values determined using the numerical procedures and existing correlations. The techniques described are valuable because they enable the determination of equivalent sand grain roughness magnitudes, for similar three-dimensional roughness, entirely from surface geometry after it is characterized by three-dimensional optical profilometry data.
19
Rough-wall boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients
A. E. Perry, P. N. Joubert · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · 1963 · 209 citations