Mechanics of locomotion and jumping in the horse (<i>Equus): in vivo</i> stress in the tibia and metatarsus

Andrew A. Biewener, J. J. Thomason, Lance E. Lanyon

Journal of Zoology · 1988 · 89 citations · 31 references

Concepts

Abstract

Principal stresses acting in the midshaft cortices of the tibia and metatarsus of the horse were determined from in vivo rosette strain gauge recordings for overground locomotion at different gaits, as well as for jumping and acceleration. Bone stresses were correlated with limb kinematics and ground reaction forces. The results for these two hind limb bones were compared to earlier determinations of locomotor stress in the forelimb radius and metacarpus (Biewener, Thomason &amp; Lanyon, 1983b). Peak stresses generally increased with increasing speed; however, because of greater bending, stresses in the tibia were substantially higher (45%) than in the metatarsus over the range of steady state speeds. Bending of the tibia resulted from significant off‐axis loading by the ground reaction force. In contrast, the metatarsus was loaded in compression due to its close alignment with the ground reaction force. Peak stresses as high as ‐ 53 MPa (caudal cortex) in the tibia and ‐38 MPa (plantar cortex) in the metatarsus acted at a canter. Increased skeletal stress was matched by a corresponding increase in ground reaction force and a decrease in hind limb duty factor. In both bones, peak stresses were significantly greater and differed in their distribution during jumping and acceleration, compared to peak stresses during steady speed locomotion. Maximal values of ‐ 126 MPa (cranial cortex) in the tibia and ‐ 117 MPa (dorsal cortex) in the metatarsus were developed during jumping. These stresses are similar in magnitude to those reported for a range of different sized mammals during strenuous activity and correspond to a safety factor to yield failure of 1.5 to 3. Though generally consistent within an individual bone, the distribution and magnitude of stresses varied about 20% among individuals. This variation was greater for the metatarsus because of its lesser curvature, which diminishes the bone's ability to control for bending in a fixed direction.

References

31