A Job Market Signaling Scheme for Incentive and Trust Management in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Nadia Haddadou, Abderrezak Rachedi, Yacine Ghamri‐Doudane

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2014 · 110 citations · 28 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

In collaborative wireless networks with low infrastructure, the presence of misbehaving nodes can have a negative impact on network performance. In particular, we are interested in dealing with this nasty presence in road safety applications, based on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). In this paper, we consider as harmful the presence of malicious nodes, which spread false and forged data, and selfish nodes, which cooperate only for their own benefit. To deal with this, we propose a distributed trust model <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="TeX">$(DTM^{2})$</tex-math></inline-formula> , which is adapted from the job market signaling model. <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="TeX">$DTM^{2} $</tex-math></inline-formula> is based on allocating <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>credits</i></b> to nodes and securely managing these credits. To motivate selfish nodes to cooperate more, our solution establishes the cost of reception to access data, forcing them to earn credits. Moreover, to detect and exclude malicious nodes, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="TeX">$DTM^{2} $</tex-math></inline-formula> requires the cost of sending, using signaling values inspired from economics and based on the node's behavior so that the more malicious a node is, the higher its sending cost, thus limiting their participation in the network. Similarly, rewards are given to nodes whose sent messages are considered truthful and that paid a sending cost considered correct. The latter is a guarantee for the receivers about the truthfulness of the message since, in the case of message refusal, the source node is not rewarded, despite its payment. We validated <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="TeX">$DTM^{2} $</tex-math></inline-formula> via a theoretical study using Markov chains and with a set of simulations in both urban and highway scenarios. Both theoretical and simulation results show that <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="TeX">$DTM^{2} $</tex-math></inline-formula> excludes from the network 100% of malicious nodes without causing any false-positive detection. Moreover, our solution guarantees a good ratio of reception, even in the presence of selfish nodes.

References

28