And they call this progress? Consequences for young people of living and working in resource-extraction communities

Shira M. Goldenberg, Jean Shoveller, Mieke Koehoorn, A. Ostry

Critical Public Health · 2010 · 62 citations · 12 references

Concepts

Abstract

Communities dependent on natural resource extraction (e.g. oil/gas, mining) are routinely exposed to rhetoric that associates notions of progress (including health and social welfare) with a booming economy. These places frequently experience demographic and social disruptions associated with reliance on resource-extraction sectors (e.g. the influx of young male workers and money, increasing rates of drug/alcohol consumption, infrastructural shortfalls). However, research regarding the problematic health and social impacts associated with resource-extraction booms are markedly absent from contemporary research pertaining to high-income countries. This paper investigates how an economic boom is perceived to affect young people's health and social well-being in Fort St. John, a booming oil/gas community in British Columbia, Canada. We conducted ethnographic fieldwork (8 weeks), including in-depth interviews with 25 young people (ages 15–25) and 14 health and social service providers. Participants identified education, addictions, and housing as key areas where the negative consequences of living and working in an oil/gas community have affected them the most. The findings illustrate the fallacy of the colloquialism that ‘the only drawback to a boom is a bust’. While the issues presented have substantial public health implications, they are generated by – and can be addressed via – sectors outside public health. Partnerships between resource-extraction companies, public health, and community organizations offer innovative and feasible opportunities to address these problems.

References

12