Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001 · 190 citations · 42 references
EngineeringSolar ConvectionSolar-terrestrial InteractionInterplanetary Shock TriggeringGeophysicsSolar Terrestrial EnvironmentAtmospheric ScienceSpace PhysicPlanetary MagnetosphereSolar ActivityUpstream ImfSpace Weather EventsPolar UvSpace WeatherMagnetospheric PlasmaAstrophysicsNightside Geomagnetic ActivitySolar VariabilityMagnetospheric PhysicsSolar Wind DataQuiescent Events
Nightside auroral responses to interplanetary shocks are categorized as substorm expansion phase, pseudobreakup, or quiescent events, and shock compression effects on the near‑Earth tail are examined within existing substorm/PB triggering models. The study investigates how interplanetary shocks and pressure pulses influence nightside magnetospheric and magnetotail activity using Wind solar wind data and Polar UV imaging. Eighteen events from a set of 53 interplanetary shock/pressure pulse occurrences in 1997–1998, for which Polar near‑midnight UV images were available, were analyzed to assess the magnetotail response. Solar‑wind preconditions, notably a ~1.5‑hour upstream southward IMF B_s, strongly influence auroral responses: 44 % of events trigger substorm expansion, 39 % trigger pseudobreakups with near‑zero IMF B_z, and 17 % remain quiescent, supporting a plasma‑sheet loading mechanism.
We use Wind solar wind data and Polar UV imaging data to study the nightside magnetospheric/magnetotail responses to interplanetary shocks/pressure pulses. Of 53 interplanetary shock/pressure pulse events that occurred in 1997 and 1998 at Wind, there are 18 cases where Polar near‐midnight UV images are available. All of these 18 events are used in this study. The nightside auroral responses can be classified into three types: substorm expansion phase (SS) (or substorm further intensification) events, pseudobreakup (PB) events, and quiescent (QE) events. It is found that the solar wind preconditions determine the causes of the different auroral responses. A ∼1.5‐hour interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) B s “precondition” (upstream of the interplanetary shock) gives good empirical results. The upstream IMF is strongly southward prior to substorm expansion phase triggerings (44% of all events), the IMF B z is ∼0 nT for PB triggerings (39% of all events), and the IMF is purely northward for quiescent events (17%). The evidence for IMF B s preconditioning is interpreted in terms of a plasma sheet loading mechanism. The interplanetary shock compression effects on the near‐Earth tail are discussed in light of existing substorm/PB triggering models.
42
The development of the auroral substorm
S.‐I. Akasofu · Planetary and Space Science · 1964 · 1.5K citations
The WIND magnetic field investigation
R. P. Lepping, M. H. Acuña, L. F. Burlaga et al. · Space Science Reviews · 1995 · 1.5K citations · Full text
P. D. Perreault, S.‐I. Akasofu · Geophysical Journal International · 1978 · 820 citations · Full text
Engineering, Solar Convection, Solar-terrestrial Interaction +17