2014 · 18 citations · 16 references
Natural SciencesComputer ScienceAlgorithmsDesign OptimizationOptimizationCombinatorial OptimizationHeuristic OptimizationHeuristic SearchMetaheuristic OptimizationMulti-objective OptimizationMultiobjective OptimizationHeuristicsHyper-heuristicsMany-objective OptimizationMultiobjective Particle Swarm OptimizationOptimization AlgorithmsParticle Swarm Optimization
Multi-Objective Problems (MOPs) presents two or more objective functions to be simultaneously optimized. MOPs presenting more than three objective functions are called Many-Objective Problems (MaOPs) and pose challenges to optimization algorithms. Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) is a promising meta-heuristic to solve MaOPs. Previous works have proposed different leader selection methods and archiving strategies to tackle the challenges caused by MaOPs, however, selecting the most appropriated components for a given problem is not a trivial task. Moreover, the algorithm can take advantage by using a variety of methods in different phases of the search. The concept of hyper-heuristic emerges for automatically selecting heuristic components for effectively solve a problem. However few works on the literature apply hyper-heuristics on multi-objective optimizers. In this work, we use a simple hyper-heuristic to select leader and archiving methods during the search. Unlike other studies our hyper-heuristic is guided by the R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> indicator due to its good measuring characteristics and low computational cost. An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the proposed hyper-heuristic in guiding the search towards its preferred region. The study compared the performance of the H-MOPSO and its low-level heuristics used separately regarding the R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> indicator. The results show that the hyper-heuristic proposed is able to guide the search through selecting the right components in most cases.
16
James Kennedy, R.C. Eberhart · 2002 · 47.5K citations
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Frank Wilcoxon · Biometrics Bulletin · 1945 · 14.4K citations
Business, Computer Science, Multi-criteria Decision Making +8
Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems
Kalyanmoy Deb, Lothar Thiele, Marco Laumanns et al. · 2003 · 1.6K citations
Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art
Edmund Burke, Michel Gendreau, Matthew Hyde et al. · Journal of the Operational Research Society · 2013 · 1.2K citations · Full text