IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2013 · 873 citations · 34 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesComputer VisionDigital ImagingRemote SensingDigital Image ProcessingDimensionality ReductionHyperspectral ImagingImage RestorationRemote Sensing Image AnalysisRemote Sensing ImageryHyperspectral AnalysisHyperspectral Data ProcessingHyperspectral Image ProcessingHyperspectral Imagery AnalysisImpulse NoiseLow-rank Matrix FactorizationLow-rank Optimization
HSIs are frequently degraded by mixed noise such as Gaussian, impulse, dead‑line, and stripe artifacts during acquisition. The study proposes a low‑rank matrix recovery approach that simultaneously removes these noise types from HSIs. By lexicographically arranging HSI patches into 2‑D matrices, exploiting their low‑rank structure, formulating the restoration as an LRMR problem, and solving it with the Go Decomposition algorithm, the authors validate the method on simulated and real data.
Hyperspectral images (HSIs) are often degraded by a mixture of various kinds of noise in the acquisition process, which can include Gaussian noise, impulse noise, dead lines, stripes, and so on. This paper introduces a new HSI restoration method based on low-rank matrix recovery (LRMR), which can simultaneously remove the Gaussian noise, impulse noise, dead lines, and stripes. By lexicographically ordering a patch of the HSI into a 2-D matrix, the low-rank property of the hyperspectral imagery is explored, which suggests that a clean HSI patch can be regarded as a low-rank matrix. We then formulate the HSI restoration problem into an LRMR framework. To further remove the mixed noise, the “Go Decomposition” algorithm is applied to solve the LRMR problem. Several experiments were conducted in both simulated and real data conditions to verify the performance of the proposed LRMR-based HSI restoration method.
34
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh et al. · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2004 · 56K citations
Robust principal component analysis?
Emmanuel J. Candès, Xiaodong Li, Yi Ma et al. · Journal of the ACM · 2011 · 6.9K citations