They wrote on wood. The case for a hieroglyphic scribal tradition on wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia

Willemijn Waal

Anatolian Studies · 2011 · 39 citations · 9 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Wooden writing boards in Hittite texts have sparked debate over their scale and whether they bore cuneiform or hieroglyphic script. This study re‑examines evidence to argue that wooden boards were used for private and economic records written in Anatolian hieroglyphs. Findings show distinct terminology linked to wood writing, a surviving hieroglyphic script, and support for two parallel traditions: a lost hieroglyphic tradition on wooden boards for private records and a cuneiform tradition for palace administration.

Abstract

Abstract The wooden writing boards frequently mentioned in Hittite texts have given rise to much debate, mostly regarding the scale on which they were used and the type of script that was written on them (cuneiform or hieroglyphs). In this paper, the evidence for the use of wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia will be (re-)evaluated. It will be argued that they were used for private and economic documents, and that they were written on in Anatolian hieroglyphs. Important indications of this are the distinct terms consistently used in connection with writing on wood, which point to a separate scribal tradition. Further, the form and nature of the hieroglyphic script itself and the fact that it survived after the fall of the Hittite empire confirm that the script must have been widely employed. It is thus proposed that two parallel scribal traditions existed in Hittite Anatolia: a (lost) hieroglyphic tradition on wooden writing boards used for private and daily economic records, and a Hittite cuneiform tradition reserved for palace administration.

References

9