Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation on adjacent levels

Abstract

Adjacent segment degeneration or fracture of the vertebral body was commonly reported in rigid fusion. Use of semirigid instruments such as PEEK rod system could be an alternative treatment. However, the biomechanical implications of using PEEK rod systems are not well understood. Purpose of this study was to compare a PEEK rod fixation system to traditional titanium rod fixation via a finite element analysis. A lumbar spine model from L2–L5 vertebral bodies was constructed. A fusion model, created by modifying the intact lumbar model, was used to simulate anterior interbody and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Loading was applied through flexion, extension, lateral bending, torsion. The greatest increase in stress was estimated at the upper disc adjacent to the titanium rod with interbody fusion. The lower increase in stress on adjacent segments occurred with PEEK rod fixation without fusion and noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion models. With the same fusion or nonfusion procedures, the stress on discs and facet joints of adjacent segments in the PEEK rod group decreased by 5–25% of that in the titanium rod group for all loading conditions. In comparison with rigid fixation, some potential advantages of using PEEK rod systems include a reduced stress on adjacent segment disc and facet joint, and the elastic ability of PEEK rod fixation allows for a greater range of motion, which may reduce the incidence of clinical complications seen with rigid fusion devices.