Compost Science & Utilization · 1999 · 11 citations · 13 references
AgricultureMicrobiologySoil SciencesSoil BiologySoil MicrobiologySoil ScienceSoil Chemical PropertiesSoil Microbial BiomassSoil Microbial PhysiologySoil PhBiomass ProductionField Evaluation Under Alkaline SoilHeavy Metal MobilityMicrobial Biomass Response To FertilizationMicrobial Biomass ResponsesMicrobial Growth KineticsPlant Biomass ProductionPlant Uptake
AbstractVicia faba, in a pot experiment with sandy and clayey soils under greenhouse conditions, was checked for growth response to different amendments with coal alkaline fly ash or cocomposted fly ash mixed with lignocellulosic residues. Soil microbial populations, pH and electrical conductivity as well as heavy metal uptake by plants were monitored. At rates of five and ten percent (on a dry matter basis) in both soils, neither fly ash alone nor cocomposted fly ash exerted any negative effect. Plant biomass production was not influenced in either clayey or sandy soil. Alkaline fly ash did not promote microbial growth when applied alone to the soils. However, cocomposted fly ash generally increased bacterial and actinomycetes counts in both soils. Fungi were not affected by ash. Due to the increase of soil pH by alkaline fly ash or cocomposted fly ash, plant uptake of heavy metals was depressed in the sandy soil. Heavy metal mobility did not cause change in the clayey soil where a high buffering capacity mitigated the effects of fly ash amendments.
13
Physical Properties of Fly Ash‐Amended Soils
Andrew C. Chang, L. J. Lund, A. L. Page et al. · Journal of Environmental Quality · 1977 · 272 citations
Agriculture, Agronomy, Soil Sciences +17
Composting Ecosystem Management for Waste Treatment
M. S. Finstein, Frederick C. Miller, Peter F. Strom et al. · Nature Biotechnology · 1983 · 107 citations
Management, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Sciences +14