Anesthesia & Analgesia · 1992 · 120 citations · 0 references
MedicineAnesthesiologyNeurologyAnesthesiaAnesthetic TechniquesNeurophysiologyIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsNeuromuscular PhysiologyNeurostimulationPeripheral Nerve StimulationCompound Action Potential RecordingCompound Muscle Action Potential AnalysisElectrical StimulationElectrically Evoked Compound Action PotentialMotor BlockadeMotor-evoked Potential MonitoringNeuromuscular Blockade MonitoringTranscranial Electrical Stimulation
We studied the feasibility of recording motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation (tce-MERs) during partial neuromuscular blockade (NMB). In 11 patients, compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle in response to transcranial electrical stimulation during various levels of vecuronium-induced NMB. The level of NMB was assessed by accelerometry of the adductor pollicis muscle after train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. The compound muscle action potential was also recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle after direct stimulation of the peroneal nerve (M-response) as an alternative means of assessing the degree of NMB. In all patients, tce-MERs could be recorded reliably during anesthesia with N2O and a continuous infusion of sufentanil (0.5 μg.kg−1·h−1). An intact train-of-four was present in all patients, and the amplitude of the first twitch was recorded and designated as the control value. Before administration of vecuronium, the M-response amplitude was 9.6±3.6 (mean±SD) mV, and the tce-MER amplitude was 1.21±0.66 mV. Although administration of vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) resulted in loss of the mechanical adductor pollicis response in 8 of the 11 patients, the M-response and the tce-MER remained recordable. Subsequently, during an infusion of vecuronium, adjusted to maintain one or two mechanical responses to train-of-four stimulation, the average M-response to peroneal nerve stimulation was 5.2±2.5 mV (53% of the control value), and tce-MER amplitude was 0.59±0.36 mV (59% of the control value). During incomplete relaxation, there was good correlation between the amplitude of the M-response and that of the tce-MER (r = 0.75; P < 0.01). the ratio of tce-MER amplitude to m-response amplitude remained constant, suggesting that it may be feasible to use the amplitude of the m-response to “calibrate” the tce-mer amplitude during vecuronium administration. the data indicate that tce-mer monitoring is feasible during clinically effective levels of NMB.