British Journal of Dermatology · 1994 · 58 citations · 24 references
EngineeringBiomedical EngineeringDermatologyBioinstrumentationBiosensorsElectrophysiologyContact DermatitisSkin AssessmentSkin ExaminationSkin Integrity AssessmentSkin IrritationBioelectrical Impedance MonitoringDermal Irritation AssessmentElectrical ImpedanceIrritation Potential AssessmentIrritation Risk AssessmentIrritation Scoring SystemsTissue Impedance Monitoring
A new, non-invasive device, which enables local measurements of electrical impedance to a controlled depth, has been used to evaluate the degree of irritation in human skin. The results have been compared with those obtained using other non-invasive techniques, i.e. with transepidermal water loss (TEWL), electrical capacitance moist measurement (ECM), laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), and visual scoring. Sodium lauryl sulphate solutions (0.1-5.0%), and a blank, were applied in Finn Chambers for 24 h on the volar forearm of 10 healthy volunteers. Values were recorded before application of the test chambers, and at 1 h, 24 h, 1 week and 2 weeks after removal. Thus, both the degree of initial damage and the healing process were monitored. There was close agreement among values obtained using electrical impedance, TEWL and visual readings. Results obtained using ECM and LDF were not consistent with the other three methods. In evaluating irritation of the skin, the practical situation may influence the choice of bioengineering tools. In most circumstances, a combination of methods would be preferable.
24
Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Alan Stuart, Sidney Siegel · Economica · 1957 · 3.4K citations
Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement
Jaliya Pinnagoda, R. A. Tupkek, Tove Agner et al. · Contact Dermatitis · 1990 · 1.1K citations
Agriculture, Environmental Engineering, Water Conservation +8