Quantitative Finance · 2013 · 26 citations · 35 references
BusinessFinanceFinancial ManagementFinancial EconomicsInvestment ManagementPortfolio ManagementCognitive Biases In InvestingInvestment FundsInvestor PsychologyMutual Fund ManagementMutual FundsComparative Data AnalysisEarnings MomentumMarket Timing AbilityMarket Timing By Fund ManagersMarket Timing EffectsMutual Fund Manager BehaviorMutual Fund Performance EvaluationSocially Responsible Mutual Funds
This paper analyses stock-picking and style-timing abilities through comparative analysis of an extensive sample of conventional and socially responsible (SR) mutual funds in the US market. Our results show that there is a little difference between conventional and SR fund managers, and even less so when we control for the presence of atypical observations. Both types of manager show negative stock-picking skills, correct size and book-to-market style-timing skills, and an absence of ability to time the market as a whole and the momentum style. Other notable findings are that the size of the fund does not affect the style-timing abilities of both conventional and SR mutual fund managers. In terms of the age of the fund, we observe that the results obtained for conventional funds are driven by older funds, while younger funds, both conventional and SR mutual funds, show perverse market-timing skills. Finally, we observe that both conventional and SR mutual fund managers make use of superior information to time the book-to-market style.
35
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Financial Economics · 1993 · 27.7K citations
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Mark M. Carhart · The Journal of Finance · 1997 · 17K citations · Full text
Harry M. Markowitz · The Journal of Finance · 1952 · 4.5K citations
Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic‐Based Benchmarks
Kent Daniel, Mark Grinblatt, Sheridan Titman et al. · The Journal of Finance · 1997 · 3.1K citations