Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence

Liisa Voutilainen, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori

Psychotherapy Research · 2011 · 74 citations · 36 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study focuses on change in interaction sequences, specifically the therapist’s conclusions and the patient’s responses, and suggests that this line of research can complement assimilation analysis and other methods of analyzing client talk. The authors analyze a single case of cognitive‑constructivist therapy using conversation analysis, focusing on the therapist’s conclusions that challenge the patient’s tendency to transform disappointment and anger into self‑blame. The patient’s responses evolved from rejection to ambivalence to agreement with the therapist’s conclusions, and the authors argue that analyzing interactionally similar talk sequences provides a sensitive method for investigating therapeutic change.

Abstract

Abstract A process of change within a single case of cognitive-constructivist therapy is analyzed by means of conversation analysis (CA). The focus is on a process of change in the sequences of interaction, which consist of the therapist's conclusion and the patient's response to it. In the conclusions, the therapist investigates and challenges the patient's tendency to transform her feelings of disappointment and anger into self-blame. Over the course of the therapy, the patient's responses to these conclusions are recast: from the patient first rejecting the conclusion, to then being ambivalent, and finally to agreeing with the therapist. On the basis of this case study, we suggest that an analysis that focuses on sequences of talk that are interactionally similar offers a sensitive method to investigate the manifestation of therapeutic change. It is suggested that this line of research can complement assimilation analysis and other methods of analyzing changes in a client's talk.

References

36