Publication | Open Access
A 16‐bp deletion in the canine <i><scp>PDK</scp>4</i> gene is not associated with dilated cardiomyopathy in a <scp>E</scp>uropean cohort of <scp>D</scp>oberman <scp>P</scp>inschers
34
Citations
3
References
2012
Year
Heart FailureGeneticsGenetic EpidemiologyDcm CasesPathologyDisease Gene IdentificationGenomicsDoberman PinschersAnimal GeneticsClinical GeneticsGenome-wide Association StudyBiostatisticsPublic HealthMolecular DiagnosticsVariant InterpretationCardiomyopathyInherited Metabolic DiseaseStatistical GeneticsMolecular MedicineCardiac PathologyCardiovascular DiseasePhysiologyVeterinary ScienceMedical GeneticsMedicineCardiovascular GeneticsCfa 14
Following a genome-wide association study (GWAS), a 16-bp deletion in the 5′ splice site of intron 10 of the pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 4 (PDK4) gene on CFA 14 has been reported to be associated with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in Doberman Pinschers.1 This PDK4 variant was further reported to be absent from 100 dogs of other breeds.1 We have previously performed a GWAS in a European cohort of Doberman Pinschers and found a significant genome-wide association for DCM on CFA 5, but not on CFA 14.2 The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of the PDK4 variant on CFA 14 in our cohort of Doberman Pinschers. We analyzed the 180 Doberman Pinschers from our previous study.2 These dogs consisted of a discovery cohort collected in Germany (71 DCM cases and 70 controls) and a validation cohort collected in UK (15 DCM cases and 24 controls). Additionally, we analyzed 490 dogs from 89 other breeds for the presence of the variant allele (Table S1). The reported variant in the PDK4 gene is CFA14: g.20,829,667_20,829,682del (genome build CanFam 3.1). We used a FAM-labeled forward primer, 5′-TGCCAAGTACTTTCAAGGAGA-3′, and an unlabeled reverse primer, 5′-CCCACTTGCATGGACTCTCT-3′, which amplify a 185- or 169-bp product from the wild-type (ins) or variant (del) allele respectively. We performed fragment size analysis on an ABI 3730 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems) as described.3 We used Fisher's exact tests to calculate significance of differences between allele and genotype frequencies in DCM cases and controls. We observed the variant PDK4 allele with the 16-bp deletion in both DCM cases and controls with an overall allele frequency of 16%. The deletion allele was slightly more frequent in DCM cases than in controls, but the difference was not significant in any of our cohorts (Table 1). We also did not observe a significant genotypic association in our cohorts (Table S2). We analyzed 490 dogs from 89 other breeds and found the homozygous ins/ins genotype in 469 dogs. We detected the heterozygous del/ins genotype in 21 dogs (Table S1). We did not observe any homozygous del/del individuals in the other breeds. The reported association of the PDK4 variant with DCM1 that was obtained in a cohort of 132 Doberman Pinschers of presumably American origin could not be replicated in a larger cohort of European origin. This PDK4 variant is not specific to Doberman Pinschers but is also present at low frequency in diverse other dog breeds. We found no evidence for an involvement of the PDK4 gene in the etiology of DCM. This work was mainly supported by the LUPA Project (www.eurolupa.org), which was funded by the European Commission (FP7, GA: 201370). The authors acknowledge all dog owners who actively participated in sample collection. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. [Correction added on 3 December 2012, after first online publication: References 1 and 2 were previously listed with the wrong reference numbers and are now referenced to the correct publications]
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1