(Neo-)extractivism – a new challenge for development theory from Latin America

Hans‐Jürgen Burchardt, Kristina Dietz

Third World Quarterly · 2014 · 385 citations · 36 references

Concepts

TL;DR

This paper addresses new challenges and identifies starting points for development theory following recent debates in Latin America on “new or neo‑extractivism,” and argues for a shift in theoretical perspectives linking development and resource extraction. The study focuses on neo‑extractivism’s concept, emergence context, and the state’s changing role, drawing on rentier theory, political ecology, and a proposed shift in theoretical perspectives linking development and resource extraction. Empirical analysis of social‑economic indicators shows that neo‑extractivism is not a temporary strategy but a consolidated development project with fundamental implications for politics, social relations, and territorial orders across Latin America.

Abstract

This paper addresses new challenges and identifies starting points for development theory following recent debates in Latin America on 'new or neo-extractivism'. It focuses on the concept of neo-extractivism and the context of its emergence, and on the changing role of the state. Looking at a number of social economic indicators, we find that, even after considering differences between countries, (neo-)extractivism is not merely a temporary economic strategy in the region. Instead, it exhibits features of a consolidated development project. Empirical evidence from the region shows the fundamental implications of resource-based development paths in politics, social relations and territorial orders. To grasp these implications conceptually, we argue for a shift in theoretical perspectives related to the link between development and resource extraction. Key elements for such a shift are to be found in recent studies in rentier theory and politics and new approaches in the field of political ecology.

References

36