Publication | Closed Access
Combined Surgical Excision and Radiation Therapy for Keloid Treatment
57
Citations
20
References
2007
Year
KeratoconusRadiation TherapyOculoplasticsMedicineMinimally Invasive ProcedureLead ShieldingVarious MethodsSurgeryWound HealingDermatologyDermatopathologyCombined Surgical ExcisionMaxillofacial SurgeryRadiation OncologyElectron BeamsPlastic SurgeryDermatological SurgeryHealth Sciences
Various methods have been attempted for the treatment and management of keloids; however, there is little satisfactory clinical evidence in long-term follow ups. Also, there is a preference for occurrence and recurrence in anatomic location. Usually anatomic locations with higher regional tension and more sebaceous glands are inclined toward pathogenesis. Thirty-eight keloids treated with combined surgical excision and postoperative irradiation, using electron beams with only a 10-mm opening by lead shielding, were investigated at a mean follow up of 4.4 +/- 2.5 years (range, 1-9 years) at a single institute. Ten locations such as the ear (n = 6), neck (n = 3), and upper lip (n = 1) were among the craniofacial locations. The hardness of the keloids and posttreatment scars was clinically and objectively tested with the Vancouver scar scale and a durometer, which is often used for the industrial measurement of thread balls and rubber. At a mean of 4.4 +/- 2.5 years of follow up, the clinical characteristics of the scars were significantly better posttreatment as 2.6 +/- 0.5 versus 1.0 +/- 0.6, 3.7 +/- 0.7 versus 1.7 +/- 0.7, 2.9 +/- 0.4 versus 1.3 +/- 0.5, and 2.7 +/- 0.5 versus 1.3 +/- 0.5 (keloid scars versus posttreatment scars: pigmentation, pliability, height and vascularity, respectively, P < 0.01). The durometer readings were significantly lower posttreatment, 15.2 +/- 3.9 versus 7.7 +/- 2.9 (keloid scars versus posttreatment scars, P < 0.01). The recurrence rate was 21.2% overall with none in craniofacial locations. Therefore, the combined treatment of surgical excision and postoperative electron beam irradiation is effective for scar quality and reducing the recurrence rate in long-term follow up.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1