A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations

Peter J. G. Pearson, Timothy J. Foxon

Energy Policy · 2012 · 193 citations · 54 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Recent efforts to promote a low‑carbon economy are framed by the view that such a transition could bring economic benefits comparable to past industrial revolutions, yet historical revolutions show that profound, long‑drawn changes in economy, technology, and society take many decades to materialize. The study investigates how low‑carbon transition arguments and challenges can be understood through the lens of the first industrial revolution and general‑purpose technologies, and argues that achieving significant long‑run economic benefits sooner requires systemic incentives for low‑carbon innovation and substitution of high‑carbon technologies. The authors analyze the low‑carbon transition by applying insights from the first industrial revolution and general‑purpose technologies to identify systemic incentives and innovation pathways. They conclude that although a low‑carbon transition would demand societal changes comparable to past industrial revolutions, it does not yet resemble them and would constitute a distinct kind of industrial revolution.

Abstract

Recent efforts to promote a transition to a low carbon economy have been influenced by suggestions that a low carbon transition offers challenges and might yield economic benefits comparable to those of the previous industrial revolutions. This paper examines these arguments and the challenges facing a low carbon transition, by drawing on recent thinking on the technological, economic and institutional factors that enabled and sustained the first (British) industrial revolution, and the role of 'general purpose technologies' in stimulating and sustaining this and subsequent industrial transformation processes that have contributed to significant macroeconomic gains. These revolutions involved profound, long drawn-out changes in economy, technology and society; and although their energy transitions led to long-run economic benefits, they took many decades to develop. To reap significant long-run economic benefits from a low carbon transition sooner rather than later would require systemic efforts and incentives for low carbon innovation and substitution of high-carbon technologies. We conclude that while achieving a low carbon transition may require societal changes on a scale comparable with those of previous industrial revolutions, this transition does not yet resemble previous industrial revolutions. A successful low carbon transition would, however, amount to a different kind of industrial revolution.

References

54