The role of the circumarctic forest–tundra ecotone for Arctic biodiversity

Abstract

Abstract The arctic forest–tundra ecotone (FTE), which links species communities of the boreal forest with those of the arctic tundra, is expected to respond swiftly to climate change with a profound reduction of tundra as the dominating scenario. With its circumarctic expanse and up to several hundred kilometres in width, the zone occupies a large part of the vegetated surface at high latitudes. Relocation and structural changes of the ecotone vegetation will affect not only plant but also animal and other biological diversity. A large number of arctic species are dependent on the FTE in terms of food and habitat during parts of their life cycle or annual migration. In the 'Arctic Species Trend Index', developed to provide trends in arctic vertebrates, more than half of the species and data are from the FTE. However, in assessments of arctic biodiversity, only the northernmost tundra-dominated areas of the ecotone are included. This is unfortunate and somewhat problematic since the treed part that serves as a source of seeds for new seedlings and saplings in the tundra-dominated part is excluded. This inconsistency hampers monitoring efficiency and biodiversity conservation efforts. During the International Polar Year, a large international research project on the FTE established numerous sites around the circumpolar north where causes and consequences of vegetation change were analysed. This network of sites and data forms an excellent basis for necessary monitoring of the spatial and temporal complexity of forest encroachment into tundra and its relation to arctic biodiversity. Keywords: arctic biodiversitycircumarctic vegetationclimate changeforest–tundra ecotonemonitoringtree and shrub encroachment Acknowledgements The paper is a product under the International Polar Year (IPY) core project PPS Arctic (http://ppsarctic.nina.no), and was financially supported by the Research Council of Norway via the IPY grant 176065/S30 and the Norway–Russia collaboration grant 185023/S50 to AH, as well as the Government of Canada Program for International Polar Year as part of the project PPS Arctic Canada to KAH. We are thankful to the PPS Arctic research group for enthusiastic collaboration.