Gender Work and Organization · 1996 · 514 citations · 19 references
Military SociologyMasculinityOrganizational BehaviorSocial SciencesGender IdentityGender TheoryGender StudiesManagementHegemonic MasculinityMilitary CultureGendered ContextIntersectionalityUs NavyFeminist TheoryMilitary InstitutionMasculinity StudiesOrganizational ConstructionSociologyLife History Interviews
The article examines how hegemonic masculinity is constructed in the US Navy and explores contradictions that threaten its secure establishment. The study uses life-history interviews of 27 male officers from aviation, surface warfare, and supply corps to examine alternative discourses and identities. The study finds that masculinity is relationally constructed, with aviators emphasizing autonomy and risk-taking, surface warfare officers emphasizing perseverance and endurance, and supply officers emphasizing technical rationality, all shaped by contrasting definitions of femininity.
This article examines the construction of hegemonic masculinity within the US Navy. Based on life history interviews with 27 male officers, this study explores alternative discourses and identities of officers from three different communities in the Navy: aviation, surface warfare, and the supply corps. Definitions of masculinity are relationally constructed through associations of difference: aviators tend to draw upon themes of autonomy and risk taking; surface warfare officers draw upon themes of perseverance and endurance; and supply officers draw upon themes of technical rationality. Further, these masculinities depend upon various contrasting definitions of femininity. Finally, this article explores a series of contradictions that threaten the secure construction of masculinity within this military culture.
19
Candace West, Don H. Zimmerman · Gender & Society · 1987 · 8.4K citations
Toward a new sociology of masculinity
Tim Carrigan, Bob Connell, John Lee · Theory and Society · 1985 · 1.3K citations
Eleanor M. Miller, Judith Lorber · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1995 · 1.2K citations