Publication | Closed Access
A Two-Objective Timetable Optimization Model in Subway Systems
196
Citations
32
References
2014
Year
Mathematical ProgrammingRailway TrafficTransport Network AnalysisEngineeringEnergy EfficiencySubway SystemsOperations ResearchTimetable Optimization ModelTrain Timetable OptimizationGenetic AlgorithmSystems EngineeringLogisticsCombinatorial OptimizationTransportation EngineeringInteger ProgrammingEnergy ManagementScheduling ProblemBusinessTrain Control
The train timetable optimization problem in subway systems is to determine arrival and departure times for trains at stations so that resources can be effectively utilized and trains can be efficiently operated. The paper proposes a timetable optimization model to increase regenerative energy utilization and shorten passenger waiting time. The authors formulate a two‑objective integer programming model controlling headway and dwell times, solve it with a binary‑encoded genetic algorithm, and test it on data from the Beijing Yizhuang subway line. The results illustrate that the proposed model can save energy by 8.86 % and reduce passenger waiting time by 3.22 % compared with the current timetable.
The train timetable optimization problem in subway systems is to determine arrival and departure times for trains at stations so that the resources can be effectively utilized and the trains can be efficiently operated. Because the energy saving and the service quality are paid more attention, this paper proposes a timetable optimization model to increase the utilization of regenerative energy and, simultaneously, to shorten the passenger waiting time. First, we formulate a two-objective integer programming model with headway time and dwell time control. Second, we design a genetic algorithm with binary encoding to find the optimal solution. Finally, we conduct numerical examples based on the operation data from the Beijing Yizhuang subway line of China. The results illustrate that the proposed model can save energy by 8.86% and reduce passenger waiting time by 3.22% in comparison with the current timetable.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1