Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · 2001 · 1.7K citations · 4 references
PharmacyPharmacologyClinical EpidemiologyClinical PharmacologyPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Event ReportingAdverse Drug Reaction ReportingDrug Safety MonitoringPharmacoepidemiologySignal DetectionSignal EvaluationAdverse Drug Reaction Signal DetectionAdverse Reactions ReportingDrug Safety ReportingPharmacovigilance AnalyticsProportional Reporting RatioReporting System EvaluationSpontaneous Reporting AnalysisSpontaneous Reporting Signal Analysis
Signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports is likened to finding a needle in a haystack, yet statistical approaches have been under‑utilised. The authors developed and evaluated a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) as a statistical aid for signal generation. PRR compares the proportion of a specific reaction for a drug to that proportion across all drugs using a 2×2 table, and was applied to 15 newly‑marketed UK drugs with thresholds of ≥3 cases, PRR ≥ 2, and chi‑square ≥ 4. The PRR identified 481 signals, of which 70 % were known adverse reactions, 13 % were likely disease‑related, and 17 % required further investigation, demonstrating its usefulness.
The process of generating 'signals' of possible unrecognized hazards from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting data has been likened to looking for a needle in a haystack. However, statistical approaches to the data have been under-utilised.Using the UK Yellow Card database, we have developed and evaluated a statistical aid to signal generation called a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR). The proportion of all reactions to a drug which are for a particular medical condition of interest is compared to the same proportion for all drugs in the database, in a 2 x 2 table. We investigated a group of newly-marketed drugs using as minimum criteria for a signal, 3 or more cases, PRR at least 2, chi-squared of at least 4.The database was used to examine retrospectively 15 drugs newly-marketed in the UK, with the highest levels of ADR reporting. The method identified 481 signals meeting the minimum criteria during the period 1996-8. Further evaluation of these showed that 70% were known adverse reactions, 13% were events which were likely to be related to the underlying disease and 17% were signals requiring further evaluation.Proportional reporting ratios are a valuable aid to signal generation from spontaneous reporting data which are easy to calculate and interpret, and various refinements are possible.
4
Systemic signalling of adverse reactions to drugs.
D. J. Finney · PubMed · 1974 · 63 citations
Responding to drug safety issues
Patrick Waller, Ennis H. Lee · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · 1999 · 35 citations