The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2009 · 100 citations · 27 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologyGeneral SurgerySurgical OncologyColorectal CancerColorectal SurgeryEndoscopic SurgeryEndoscopic Tumor ResectionGastrointestinal EndoscopyMinimally Invasive SurgeryColon Cancer SurgeryEndoscopic Cancer ResectionEndoscopic ElectrosurgeryLower Gastrointestinal EndoscopyRectal Cancer SurgeryTumor En Bloc Resection
OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently not a common treatment for colorectal neoplasms because it is time consuming and technically difficult. Flushknife--an electrosurgical endo-knife with a water-jet function--is expected to reduce the difficulty of colorectal ESD. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a water-jet function for colorectal ESD. METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at a cancer referral center. A total of 49 patients, with a total of 51 superficial colorectal neoplasms (median tumor size of 30 mm), were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using either the Flexknife (electrosurgical endo-knife without a water-jet function) or the Flushknife. Tumors were resected by ESD using each endo-knife. The procedures were conducted by two endoscopists. Operation time was defined as the main outcome measure. RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in 23 out of 26 (88%) lesions in the Flexknife group and in 24 out of 24 (100%) lesions in the Flushknife group. The mean operation time (95% confidence interval) was 87.3 (71.3-103.4) min in the Flexknife group and 61.0 (49.3-72.7) min in the Flushknife group (P=0.02). The Flushknife reduced the number of endoscopic device changes (P=0.001), the number of submucosal injections (P=0.001), and the mean amount of injected hyaluronate sodium (P=0.001) compared with the Flexknife. No severe adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Without increasing adverse events, the endo-knife with a water-jet function efficiently reduced the operation time of colorectal ESD in patients with large superficial colorectal neoplasms. (University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000001302).
27
Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Sidney J. Winawer, Ann G. Zauber, May Nah Ho et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1993 · 4.6K citations · Full text
The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia
Ronald J. Schlemper · Gut · 2000 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer
Hiroyuki Ono · Gut · 2001 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Haruhiro Inoue, Hiroshi Kashida, Shin‐ei Kudo et al. · IRIS · 2003 · 1.1K citations
Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited
Michael F. Dixon · Gut · 2002 · 683 citations · Full text