BMC Health Services Research · 2010 · 64 citations · 37 references
Health ProfessionsHealth AdministrationRisk ManagementHospital AdministrationPatient SafetyRisk AssessmentClinical Risk ManagementHealth Care Risk ManagementHealthcare Risk ManagementHospital Risk ManagementSafety AssessmentSafety ManagementHealthcare Risk AssessmentPatient Safety In Healthcare SettingsPatient Safety IndicatorsPatient Safety ManagementPatient Safety MeasurementPilot InterviewsPilot Program EvaluationSystematic Literature Review
BACKGROUND: Clinical risk management (CRM) plays a crucial role in enabling hospitals to identify, contain, and manage risks related to patient safety. So far, no instruments are available to measure and monitor the level of implementation of CRM. Therefore, our objective was to develop an instrument for assessing CRM in hospitals. METHODS: The instrument was developed based on a literature review, which identified key elements of CRM. These elements were then discussed with a panel of patient safety experts. A theoretical model was used to describe the level to which CRM elements have been implemented within the organization. Interviews with CRM practitioners and a pilot evaluation were conducted to revise the instrument. The first nationwide application of the instrument (138 participating Swiss hospitals) was complemented by in-depth interviews with 25 CRM practitioners in selected hospitals, for validation purposes. RESULTS: The monitoring instrument consists of 28 main questions organized in three sections: 1) Implementation and organizational integration of CRM, 2) Strategic objectives and operational implementation of CRM at hospital level, and 3) Overview of CRM in different services. The instrument is available in four languages (English, German, French, and Italian). It allows hospitals to gather comprehensive and systematic data on their CRM practice and to identify areas for further improvement. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an instrument for assessing development stages of CRM in hospitals that should be feasible for a continuous monitoring of developments in this important area of patient safety.
37
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher, A. Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ · 2009 · 83.3K citations · Full text
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
BMJ · 2001 · 10.8K citations
Andrew Wall · British Journal of Healthcare Management · 2000 · 5.9K citations
Health Professions, Health Policy, Health Services Administration +8
Human error: models and management
James Reason · BMJ · 2000 · 5.4K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Human Resource Management, Organizational Behavior +12