Conservation Biology · 1996 · 24 citations · 30 references
Life SciencesBiologyGeneticsPlant GeneticsPopulation BiologyPopulation GeneticsGenetic DiversityGenetic DriftPopulation DifferentiationPopulation StructureSpatial Genetic PatternsSpatial Genetic StructureGene Flow DynamicsGenetic Drift EffectsHierarchical Genetic StructurePopulation Genetic StructureRare SpeciesSpatial Autocorrelation Across ScalesSpatial Population StructureSpatial Scale Effects
Genetic structure at several spatial scales was examined in the rare California annual, Clarkia springvillensis . Using seven isozyme‐encoding loci as genetic markers, we assessed the amount and distribution of genetic variation among three populations and eight subpopulations. Total genetic variation was lower than in species with similar life history traits but equivalent to that of other endemic plants. Spatial autocorrelation showed some evidence for very limited differentiation within subpopulations at a scale of 1–2 m. The subpopulations, separated by tens of meters, were found to be more differentiated from each other ( F sp = 0.084) on average than were populations ( F,pt = 0.017). This local genetic differentiation was not correlated with physical distance between subpopulations. The low F pt estimates suggest that substantial gene flow is occurring among populations. However, the lack of correlation between genetic and geographic distances and the significant differentiation of subpopulations suggest that genetic drift is occurring within populations. Therefore, we believe the apparent homogeneity of populations is due to each population’s gene frequencies’ being an average of several divergent subpopulations. If drift is causing differentiation within populations, it may eventually cause differentiation between populations. The importance of using a hierarchical approach to evaluating genetic structure is clear. Patterns occurring at one spatial scale may not be evident at others. One should not necessarily conclude that gene flow is substantial and that the risk of genetic erosion via drift is negligible just because differentiation between populations is small; the system may not be at equilibrium. This lesson is particularly important when recent changes in climate or land use are apparent.
30
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Joe Felsenstein · Cladistics · 1989 · 17.9K citations
ESTIMATING<i>F</i>-STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
B. S. Weir, C. Clark Cockerham · Evolution · 1984 · 16.9K citations
Genetic Distance between Populations
Masatoshi Nei · The American Naturalist · 1972 · 9.9K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Genetics +11
THE GENETICAL STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS
Sewall Wright · Annals of Eugenics · 1949 · 6.9K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Genetics +8