Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · 2005 · 352 citations · 39 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceClimate Change ManagementClimate PolicyEnvironmental PoliticsClimate GovernanceClimate PoliticsClimate Change PoliticsClimate Change RegimeClimate Political EconomyClimate SovereigntyMarket-based SolutionsTheoretical Framework Alignment
Foucault’s theory expands power beyond sovereignty to include discipline, biopower, liberal and advanced liberal government, and the article argues that climate change governance has shifted from biopower to advanced liberal government. The article develops a theoretical framework using Foucault’s governmentality to argue that climate change was first rendered governable by biopower and later by advanced liberal government. The framework employs a governmentality analysis that interrogates the visibilities, knowledge fields, practices, and identities produced by the global climate regime. The study finds that since the mid‑1990s climate change has been framed as an economic issue requiring market‑based solutions, and that programme failure is already embedded in the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol.
Abstract This article generates a theoretical framework for analysing the politics of climate change on the basis of Michel Foucault's concept of governmentality. Foucault does not limit the exercise of power to sovereignty, but introduces discipline, biopower, liberal and advanced liberal government as alternative configurations of state and power. The article argues that the ways in which climate change is rendered a governable entity are best understood before the background of a shift from biopower to advanced liberal government. It will be argued that climate change was first rendered governable by biopower, which justified global management of spaceship Earth in the name of the survival of life on Earth. Since the mid-1990s, climate change has been captured by advanced liberal government, which articulates climate change as an economic issue that requires market-based solutions to facilitate cost-effective technological solutions. A governmentality analysis asks which visibilities, fields of knowledge, practices and identities this 'global climate regime' is actually producing, rather than assuming that what it does or is supposed to do is known. In that way, the ways in which programme failure has already been built into the very formation of the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol can be identified.
39
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Gottfried Salomon Delatour, Max Weber, A. M. Henderson et al. · American Sociological Review · 1948 · 11.5K citations
Governmentality: power and rule in modern society
Choice Reviews Online · 2010 · 6.2K citations
Peter Bachrach, Morton S. Baratz · American Political Science Review · 1962 · 3.3K citations