Hypoglycemia in a Patient With a Big “Big”-IGF-II-Producing Tumor

Gonnie Alkemade, Martijn L. Bakker, Bart Rikhof, Frank F. A. IJpma, Robert J. van Ginkel, Philip M. Kluin, Jaap van Doorn, Robin P. F. Dullaart

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2013 · 13 citations · 4 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Non-islet cell tumor-induced hypoglycemia is a rare cause of hypoglycemia (1). Mesenchymal and epithelial tumors account for most cases (2, 3). A 60-year-old man with a palpable abdominal mass (computed tomography scan, 12 16 16-cm lesion, retroperitoneal) presented with neuroglycopenia responding to iv glucose. A fasting test confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemia (plasma glucose, 2.3 mmol/L within 4 h). Plasma levels of insulin (0.2 mU/L) and C-peptide ( 10 pmol/L) were suppressed, excluding endogenous hyperinsulinemia. Plasma IGF-I was also suppressed ( 2.6 nmol/L). Plasma total IGF-II was normal (460 ng/mL; 0.57 SD score) but pro-IGF-IIE (68–88) (“big”-IGF-II) was markedly raised (98 ng/ml; 8.97 SD score) (4). In agreement with the hypothesis that aberrant processing of IGF-II disrupts the ternary complex of IGF-II, IGF-binding protein 3, and acid labile subunit, we show here that pro-IGF-IIE (68– 88) was mainly present within binary complexes and as plasma free “big”-IGF-II (Figure 1). This would increase its accessibility to insulin and IGF-I receptors, ultimately leading to hypoglycemia and suppression of the pituitary GH-IGF-I axis (2, 3). Our patient fully recovered after surgery (histology, Figure 2), and successfully passed a 72-hour fasting test (glucose, 4.6 mmol/L). All laboratory parameters, including pro-IGF-IIE (68–88), had normalized. The distribution of “big”-IGF-II in the postoperative plasma became comparable to control plasma (Figure 1). The patient is still asymptomatic 1 year after surgery, with 10-year recurrence-free survival expected to be 50% (5). “Big”-IGF-II-producing tumors should be considered in tumor patients presenting with hypoglycemia. This case demonstrates that the ensuing changes in “big”-IGF-II distribution toward free pro-IGF-IIE (68–88) coincide with IGF-I suppression and are fully reversible.

References

4