The Relationship between Coercion and Protest

Ronald Α. Francisco

Journal of Conflict Resolution · 1995 · 303 citations · 34 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The relationship between coercion and protest, central to rebellion theory, remains unresolved amid competing formal and empirical hypotheses. The study tests competing hypotheses about coercion and protest using two predator‑prey models. Parameters for both models were estimated from time‑series data of the GDR, Czechoslovakia, and the Palestinian Intifada. All three cases show stable, damped relationships; the inverted‑U hypothesis is less supported than the backlash alternative, and protesters adapt tactics in response to coercion.

Abstract

The relationship between coercion and protest, arguably the core of any theory of rebellion, remains unresolved. Competing hypotheses have emerged from formal models and empirical research. This article uses two forms of the predator-prey model to test these competing hypotheses. Time-series data from three coercive states (the German Democratic Republic, Czechoslovakia, and the Palestinian Intifada) are used to estimate parameters for both models. Results show stable, damped relationships in all three cases. The “inverted U” hypothesis receives less support than its “backlash” alternative, that is, that dissidents react strongly to extremely harsh coercion. Moreover, the study indicates that protesters adapt to coercion by changing tactics.

References

34