Geophysical Research Letters · 1992 · 100 citations · 3 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesGeodesyGeographic Information ScienceGlobal Navigation Satellite SystemsGeodetic NetworksGnss Reference FramesAccuracyCovarianceGlobal Positioning SystemInternational Terrestrial Reference FrameStandard Errors Of MeasurementStation Coordinate EstimationStation Coordinates EstimationTerrestrial Reference Frames
Using 21 days of Global Positioning System (GPS) data from 21 globally distributed receivers operating during early 1991, we solve for a 7‐parameter transformation between a GPS free‐network solution and coordinates of 12 stations listed in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). Standard errors of GPS coordinates are derived by applying an orthogonal projection operator to the free‐network covariance. The weighted RMS difference between 33 transformed GPS and ITRF coordinates is 12 mm in the northern hemisphere. Best results are obtained by mapping ITRF coordinates to the epoch of this experiment assuming no vertical site motions. Fixing selected sites in the GPS solution to ITRF'90 does not improve the agreement. We conclude the use of fiducial constraints is unnecessary for global networks.
3
Global geodesy using GPS without fiducial sites
M. B. Heflin, Willy Bertiger, G. Blewitt et al. · Geophysical Research Letters · 1992 · 155 citations
Comparison of VLBI and SLR geocentric site coordinates
Jim Ray, Chao Ma, James W. Ryan et al. · Geophysical Research Letters · 1991 · 41 citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Geodesy +10
Kristine M. Larson, F. Webb, Duncan Carr Agnew · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 1991 · 32 citations