On failure modeling

Austin J. Lemoine, Michael L. Wenocur

Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · 1985 · 97 citations · 10 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Accurate representation of failure dynamics can improve prediction of reliability, maintainability, and availability. The paper proposes a promising approach to failure modeling that aims to enhance prediction and estimation of reliability, maintainability, and availability. The approach models wear and tear as a diffusion process and fatal shocks as a state‑dependent Poisson process, declaring failure when wear exceeds a threshold or a shock occurs. The method yields significant merit by offering new insights into common lifetime distributions, suggesting intuitive enhancements to standard models, and providing a framework to represent underlying failure dynamics.

Abstract

Abstract A promising approach to failure modeling, in particular to developing failure‐time distributions, is discussed. Under this approach, system state or wear and tear is modeled by an appropriately chosen random process—for example, a diffusion process—and the occurrences of fatal shocks are modeled by a Poisson process whose rate function is state dependent. The system is said to fail when either wear and tear accumulates beyond an acceptable or safe level or a fatal shock occurs. This approach has significant merit. First, it provides revealing new insights into most of the famous and frequently used lifetime distributions in reliability theory. Moreover, it suggests intuitively appealing ways for enhancing those standard models. Indeed, this approach provides a means of representing the underlying dynamics inherent in failure processes. Reasonable postulates for the dynamics of failure should lend credence to the prediction and estimation of reliability, maintainability, and availability. In other words, accuracy of representation could lead to better, more reliable prediction of failure.

References

10