Publication | Closed Access
LATE PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY
39
Citations
3
References
1953
Year
Peripheral Arterial EmbolectomyThrombosisPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThrombosisEndovascular TechniqueCardiovascular DiseaseMedicinePeripheral InterventionPatient SafetyThrombus DistalVascular SurgerySo-called Tail ThrombusSurgeryPublic HealthStrokeAtherosclerosisAnesthesiology
UNDOUBTEDLY a major factor in success or failure in peripheral arterial embolectomy has been the time elapsing between the occurrence of the embolism and surgery. There is no uniform agreement on the limits of the optimum period for embolectomy. McClure and Harkins1set the first 12 hours as the optimum period. Heanley2would have the surgery done in the first 10 hours. Pearse,3in reviewing 282 embolectomies, found little difference between the results of those done in the first and those done in the second five-hour periods. The combined average of successful operations in these two periods was 40. The average of the second 10-hour period was 14%, and of the third was 8%. He concluded that after 48 hours the operation was not worth doing. He attributes failure to ( 1 ) the formation of a thrombus distal to the embolus, so-called tail thrombus, and (2) changes in
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1