The Annals of Statistics · 1991 · 406 citations · 7 references
Natural SciencesBiostatisticsMathematicsEconometricsStatistical ModelingStatisticsBootstrap MethodsConfidence IntervalsInferential StatisticsLikelihood EstimationResampling MethodsStatistical InferenceBootstrap Confidence IntervalsBootstrap EstimationCoverage Error AnalysisEmpirical LikelihoodLikelihood Confidence IntervalsLikelihood-based Confidence IntervalsLog-likelihood RatioSample Size Estimation
It is shown that, in a very general setting, the empirical likelihood method for constructing confidence intervals is Bartlett-correctable. This means that a simple adjustment for the expected value of log-likelihood ratio reduces coverage error to an extremely low $O(n^{-2})$, where $n$ denotes sample size. That fact makes empirical likelihood competitive with methods such as the bootstrap which are not Bartlett-correctable and which usually have coverage error of size $n^{-1}$. Most importantly, our work demonstrates a strong link between empirical likelihood and parametric likelihood, since the Bartlett correction had previously only been available for parametric likelihood. A general formula is given for the Bartlett correction, valid in a very wide range of problems, including estimation of mean, variance, covariance, correlation, skewness, kurtosis, mean ratio, mean difference, variance ratio, etc. The efficacy of the correction is demonstrated in a simulation study for the case of the mean.
7
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Yasuhiro Omori, Norman L. Johnson, S. Kotz et al. · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1995 · 9.3K citations
Empirical Likelihood Ratio Confidence Regions
Art B. Owen · The Annals of Statistics · 1990 · 1.5K citations · Full text