Urban Water Journal · 2015 · 31 citations · 31 references
EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringWater Resources ManagementWastewater TreatmentWater Resources EngineeringWater TreatmentIrrigationIrrigation Water QualityResource Recovery From WastewaterSecondary TreatmentWastewater Resource RecoveryWater ManagementReverse Osmosis MembranesTreated Wastewater ReuseTreatment Cost AnalysisUltrafiltration MembranesWastewater EconomicsWastewater Treatment MembranesWater Quality RecoveryWater Treatment Membranes
Techno-economic feasibility of water recovery from secondary effluents of an urban wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for landscape irrigation was investigated considering two distinctive strategies: ultrafiltration (UF)/chlorination and UF/reverse osmosis (RO). Experimental performance evaluations were conducted separately for UF membranes and for different RO trans-membrane pressures. The quality of the effluent recovered by the UF/RO system was in accordance with the national and international guidelines. The produced reuse water was first class quality according to the national guideline for all parameters except sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), which can be eliminated readily by direct addition of KCl into the recovered water. Estimated field-scale costs indicated that UF/RO yielded a total cost of US$12,500,000–13,600,000 with annual operating cost being US$482,000–533,000 at 5–20 bar. The economic estimations guaranteed reimbursement with US$7,600,000–7,400,000 net present value, 0.22–0.39 year payback time, US$0.44–0.49/m3 treatment cost, and a benefit/cost ratio of 0.57.
31
Journal of Agricultural Science
Pekka Huhtanen, A.N. Hristov · The Journal of Agricultural Science · 2009 · 748 citations · Full text
Francisco Pedrero Salcedo, Ioannis K. Kalavrouziotis, J.J. Alarcón et al. · Agricultural Water Management · 2010 · 583 citations
Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Water Resources Management +14